Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has declined to open a defence in his ongoing trial before the Federal High Court, Abuja.
Kanu, who initially requested additional time to study his case file and secure witness summons, announced a change in strategy when his trial resumed. After reviewing the prosecution’s submissions, Kanu told the court he believes that no valid charge stands against him, asserting there is no case to answer regarding the alleged terrorism offences.
Court proceedings had previously been adjourned for Kanu to begin his defence following his application for witness summons and additional time to prepare. However, upon reconvening, he stood firm in his position, refusing to call witnesses and insisting the evidence presented fails to establish any criminal wrongdoing.
The IPOB leader maintained that he has been subject to an unlawful trial and, therefore, sees no rationale in mounting a defence against what he describes as baseless charges.
Justice James Omotosho, presiding over the trial, responded by directing Kanu to file a written address outlining his position and serve the same to the prosecution team. The judge also advised Kanu to seek expert opinions from criminal law practitioners to fully understand the implications of his chosen legal path.
Subsequently, the matter was adjourned until the 4th, 5th, and 6th of November for adoption of final written addresses. These sessions will determine if the existing evidence and charges substantiate any case against Kanu or if he will proceed to formally enter a defence.
This development marks a pivotal moment in the highly watched trial, which has significant political and social repercussions within Nigeria.
Key stakeholders and legal observers are closely monitoring the process, anticipating its impact on due process and broader discussions surrounding the IPOB and government responses to separatist movements.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION